(See other statistics by hovering over “Stats” in the top menu.)

Fall 2010 vs Fall 2009

US News rankCollegeTransfer rate 09Transfer rate 10Change
1Harvard0%2%2%
1Princeton0%N/A0%
3Yale2%5%2%
4Columbia6%7%1%
5Stanford2%7%5%
5U Penn19%4%-16%
5Cal Tech5%2%-3%
5MIT6%14%8%
5U Chicago18%15%-2%
10Duke13%9%-4%
11Dartmouth6%4%-2%
12Northwestern16%11%-4%
13Johns Hopkins8%10%1%
14Washington U in St. Louis18%9%-9%
15Brown8%11%3%
15Cornell22%22%0%
17Rice25%26%1%
17Vanderbilt51%41%-11%
19Notre Dame35%37%2%
20Emory39%36%-4%
21UC Berkeley26%23%-3%
22Georgetown14%23%9%
23Carnegie Mellon15%17%2%
23USC26%27%1%
25UCLA32%29%-2%
25UVA39%40%1%
25Wake Forest29%30%1%
28U Michigan44%41%-3%
29Tufts26%11%-15%
29UNC Chapel Hill36%41%5%
31Boston College21%16%-6%
31Brandeis37%46%10%
33College of William & Mary44%43%-1%
33NYU33%30%-3%
35U Rochester21%22%1%
36Georgia Tech35%34%-1%
37UC San Diego62%56%-6%
38Lehigh39%30%-8%
38UC Davis70%36%-34%
38Case Western Reserve37%66%30%
38U Miami39%35%-4%
42UC Santa Barbara66%52%-14%
42U Washington62%45%-17%
42U Wisconsin46%45%-1%
45UC Irvine47%42%-5%
45UT Austin43%49%5%
45Penn State44%47%3%
45U Illinois52%41%-11%
45Yeshiva74%80%6%
50George Washington UN/A27%0%

Data source: collegeboard.com

Some notes:

The last column takes the transfer admissions rate for 10 and subtracts the transfer admissions rate for 09. A positive percentage means the transfer admissions rate for 10 was higher than the transfer admissions rate in 09 (i.e., very simplistically, with all other things equal, it was easier to get in as a transfer in 10 than it was in 09).

Schools with an “NA” next to their 2009 admissions rate were not in the US News Top 50 the year before, and we weren’t able to get the numbers for them.